{"id":329,"date":"2020-01-14T04:25:26","date_gmt":"2020-01-14T04:25:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/?p=329"},"modified":"2020-01-14T04:25:26","modified_gmt":"2020-01-14T04:25:26","slug":"january-2020-backgammon-tournament-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/?p=329","title":{"rendered":"January 2020 Backgammon Tournament Results"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We had a great turnout for our first tournament of 2020 &#8211; 18 players! There were a couple of brand new people, maybe three if you count Kate who showed up to watch last month but played for the first time this month. And there were a few last minute cancellations as well, plus some regulars who were not available&#8230; I am thinking we&#8217;re going to break the 20 player threshold in the next few months.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m thinking about making some structural changes to deal with the larger turnouts. Rather than run things as one big (and confusing) Swiss-style event, I might break the group up into several double-elimination brackets, which would mean payouts to more players, but lower payouts. It would also mean I need to spend a lot less brain-power on keeping people paired up properly, as those pairings would all be set at the initial draw. Keeping the pairings straight is a challenge with 12+ players. For instance, this month, at one point I had to pair Jeremy (who had 3 wins\/no losses at that point) with Brad (who had 2 wins\/no losses) because they were the only two undefeated players left. Not such a big deal, if Brad had won; because at the time I was playing Tim and we both had 2\/0 records. If Brad had won, then I would have played him, and the winner would have needed 4 wins to win the tournament, which is perfect for an over-16 person bracket.<\/p>\n<p>But sadly, Jeremy won his match against Brad, meaning that he was going to need 5 wins to win the tournament. Sort of unfair, since his opponent only needed 4 wins. We dealt with that by agreeing to a double-win criteria for his opponent &#8211; that is, if Jeremy won the first match he won 1st, if he lost then his opponent would have to win a second match to win 1st, since at that point they would be &#8220;tied&#8221; with 4 wins each.<\/p>\n<p>That opponent, by the way, was me. I had a pretty dramatic match with Tim. I won the first game, he won the second. In the third game, he doubled me fairly early, and I was able to turn it around to where I could re-cube him. I should have taken a picture at that point, because it seemed like a close decision. Tim decided to drop. In the fourth game, I was able to hit and cover my home board on about roll three, and turn that into a successful blitz, winning by a gammon.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s how I ended up in a position to eventually take second place.<\/p>\n<p>In our first match, Jeremy and I had some good back and forth, I eventually took it 5-3. In the second match, I was not as lucky, and ended up losing 5-1. So Jeremy gets the first tournament win of 2020, and is currently leading the pack in terms of (1) total matches played, (2) matches won, and (3) winning percentage.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not yet sure what format it will take, but there will be some kind of awards handed out for each of those metrics for 2020. I&#8217;m taking myself out of the consideration for the total matches played, because I have a unfair advantage as the organizer &#8211; I will be at every tournament this year, and most likely I will be the only person with that distinction. Maybe not &#8211; Nate, Tim, and Chris all came close to having 100% attendance last year, and there wasn&#8217;t a ribbon at stake then.<\/p>\n<p>See you next month!<\/p>\n<p>-Mark<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We had a great turnout for our first tournament of 2020 &#8211; 18 players! There were a couple of brand new people, maybe three if you count Kate who showed up to watch last month but played for the first time this month. And there were a few last minute cancellations as well, plus some &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/?p=329\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;January 2020 Backgammon Tournament Results&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=329"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":330,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions\/330"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}