{"id":198,"date":"2018-03-26T21:58:32","date_gmt":"2018-03-26T21:58:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/?p=198"},"modified":"2018-03-26T21:58:32","modified_gmt":"2018-03-26T21:58:32","slug":"planning-the-portlandia-backgammon-classic-part-last","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/?p=198","title":{"rendered":"Planning the Portlandia Backgammon Classic (Part Last)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Whew &#8211; it&#8217;s over!<\/p>\n<p>Not quite &#8211; I have emailed results out to the participants, and to Chicago Point, but I have not yet updated the event page on this site. Wanted to get some thoughts out of my head first&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>First lesson learned: just in time beats preparation. I used index cards, shuffled, to establish the initial order of match-ups. I had pre-written the cards for people who paid in advance, but a spilled cup of tea led to us having to re-do most of those as people registered. In the confusion, one (dry) card too many made it into the intermediate pile, leading me to be confused as to how many players I had. I should have had only one &#8220;play in&#8221; game in that bracket, but I set up two, and then had to balance it with a first round bye elsewhere! Major goof and my biggest regret from the event.<\/p>\n<p>Second lesson learned: you need to be very clear with people. Had a couple of completely preventable issues that arose due to poorly explained clock controls (2 points\/game in the match means 22 minutes on the clock at the start of the 11 point match, not to reset the clock to 2 minutes each game&#8230; although that&#8217;d be an interesting variation&#8230;) If the player says &#8220;I&#8217;ll be back between X and X+1&#8221;, say &#8220;be back at X or else&#8221;, not &#8220;try for X&#8221;. Confusion leads to hurt feelings. I don&#8217;t mind hurting feelings, but I don&#8217;t want to do it unnecessarily.<\/p>\n<p>Third lesson learned: get buy-in. I had\u00a0over 10 no-shows, only two of which gave me the courtesy of a note in advance. I had a few short of the walk-ins that I expected. So my mood was depressed by the swing from expected. I had told locals that they could just RSVP via meetup and pay day of, but that meant people were registering as a &#8220;yeah, I&#8217;ll maybe go do that&#8221; rather than really committing to the event. I&#8217;m still grumpy about that.<\/p>\n<p>Still, once we got rolling, it did go pretty smoothly.<\/p>\n<p>Financially, it looks like it&#8217;ll be close to a break-even, which met my expectations based on the numbers we had. We had 32 players, I figured break-even would be 30-35. I&#8217;m still waiting for the final bill from the hotel for coffee and set-up, but ball-park figuring those, we had $1400 in revenue from the event (hospitality fees + rakes from the various tourneys), and expenses of $1300 or so. I hope. If the bill includes two more gallons of coffee than I expect, expenses will exceed revenue! But some of those expenses are non-recurring for next year (spare boards, extra clocks) or for materials I can save to next year (still have about a third of the pens and about half the score pages). So even if the coffee bill puts me in the red for the event this year, I can think about amortizing those expenses over several years and claim a win. I was hoping to do a little better than that, as the club has been running in the red so far, but still&#8230; not a failed venture, not a home-run.<\/p>\n<p>I know some of what I want to do differently next year, and I plan to do a survey of the people who came to see what they want different as well. And in another 3-6 months, hopefully, I will have the energy to start planning again.<\/p>\n<p>-Mark<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whew &#8211; it&#8217;s over! Not quite &#8211; I have emailed results out to the participants, and to Chicago Point, but I have not yet updated the event page on this site. Wanted to get some thoughts out of my head first&#8230; First lesson learned: just in time beats preparation. I used index cards, shuffled, to &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/?p=198\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Planning the Portlandia Backgammon Classic (Part Last)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=198"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":199,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198\/revisions\/199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pdxbg.club\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}